JORDAN OLDER SOCCER PLAYER

JORDAN OLDER SOCCER PLAYER

JORDAN OLDER SOCCER PLAYER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), Major League Soccer, L.L.C. filed an opposition on 16 March 2018 against the trademark application filed by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. Even though MLS challenged the application, Jordan Older in the end opted to voluntarily withdraw his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, heard by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), followed the typical practice in trademark law, in which larger organisations, such as Major League Soccer, seek to protect their brand by opposing smaller applications. Jordan Older, despite the opposition from MLS, succeeded to avoid a extended legal conflict by choosing to abandon the application on his own terms, consequently avoiding potentially costly and lengthy litigation.

The opposition was supervised by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with support staff support from Nicole M. Thier. Initially, a notice get more info was issued, and trial dates were set, with an answer required from Older by 25 April 2018. Nonetheless, the matter was promptly resolved on April 5, 2018, when the case was closed and terminated. The rapid conclusion suggests that Jordan Older effectively navigated the complexities of the opposition process by choosing to abandon the mark, settling the case before any significant legal disputes arose.

This resolution demonstrates Older’s ability to settle the issue without delay, escaping what could have been an challenging legal challenge from a major sports entity. His decision to on his own terms abandon the mark shows his strategic approach, allowing him to bypass the expenses and drawn-out proceedings common in trademark disputes. While Major League Soccer’s opposition never achieved a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case illustrates how independent applicants can make careful legal decisions to avoid confrontations with large organisations without engaging in long litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.

Report this page